Every year, shippers discover the limits of their freight coverage at the worst possible moment – when a claim is already in front of them. A damaged pallet, a missing consignment, a load that arrived soaked after a trailer seal failed somewhere on a night route through Germany. The instinct is to assume that someone will be responsible and that the loss will be covered. The reality is more complicated, and the gap between what shippers expect and what standard freight liability actually provides is wider than most people realise. RoadFreightCompany works through these questions with clients before shipments move – because the moment a claim arises is not the moment to start reading the fine print.
What CMR Liability Actually Covers
Road freight across Europe is governed by the CMR convention, which establishes a carrier’s liability for loss or damage during transport. Compensation is calculated at a fixed rate per kilogram of cargo – currently 8.33 Special Drawing Rights per kilogram, roughly €10–11 per kg. For heavy industrial components, that figure may be adequate. For electronics, pharmaceuticals, or any high-value goods where commercial value significantly exceeds the weight-based calculation, it falls well short.
There are also circumstances under which a carrier’s liability is reduced or eliminated entirely. Damage caused by inadequate packaging is a common exclusion. So is loss resulting from the inherent nature of the goods – perishables that deteriorate, fragile items that break under normal transport conditions. Force majeure events and instructions given by the shipper that contributed to the loss can all reduce a carrier’s exposure. These are not obscure clauses – they are standard features of how CMR liability works, and shippers who are not aware of them tend to be unpleasantly surprised when a claim is assessed. The freight advisory team at RoadFreightCompany walks new clients through exactly these exclusions before the first shipment moves – because understanding what is not covered is as important as understanding what is.
The Gap Between CMR and Actual Cargo Value
The practical consequence of CMR’s weight-based calculation is that a significant portion of the commercial value of most high-value shipments is simply not covered under standard carrier liability. A pallet of consumer electronics weighing 400kg at a commercial value of €40,000 would attract a maximum CMR payout of roughly €4,400 – about eleven percent of the actual loss. This is where cargo insurance becomes relevant – not as an optional extra, but as a basic risk management tool for any shipper moving goods whose commercial value substantially exceeds the weight-based CMR limit.
Cargo insurance covers the actual declared value of the goods, subject to policy terms, and operates independently of the carrier’s liability position. The two are not alternatives – they address different parts of the risk picture. Understanding that distinction is the starting point for building a freight coverage approach that actually protects the business.
What a Useful Cargo Insurance Policy Actually Looks Like
Not all cargo insurance policies provide the same protection. Key variables include whether the policy covers all-risk or named perils only, how the claims process works in practice, whether coverage applies during loading and unloading or only while the vehicle is in transit, and what documentation is required to support a claim. All-risk coverage is generally preferable for shippers who move varied cargo types, because it covers loss or damage from any cause not explicitly excluded rather than requiring proof that the loss falls within a listed category.
The documentation requirement is worth examining carefully before a loss occurs rather than after. Most policies require prompt notification, evidence of declared value, proof of delivery showing damage was noted at receipt, and supporting documentation from the carrier. Shippers who do not have robust proof-of-delivery processes in place often find that assembling this evidence retrospectively is difficult – and that difficulty can affect the outcome of a claim even when the underlying loss is genuine. Building the documentation habit before it is needed is significantly easier than trying to reconstruct events afterward. Freight coverage reviews are something RoadFreightCompany conducts as a standard part of onboarding – not as a formality, but because clients who have clarity on their coverage position make better decisions about packaging, documentation, and route selection from the start.
Practical Steps Before the Next Shipment
Adrian van Ree, founder of RoadFreightCompany, puts it directly: “Most shippers find out what their coverage actually means when they file their first claim. That is the wrong time to learn.”
A freight coverage review does not need to be complicated. The practical questions are: what is the maximum commercial value of any single shipment you move regularly, how does that compare to the CMR limit based on weight, and is the difference covered by a cargo insurance policy with terms you have actually read? For the majority of shippers moving anything other than low-value bulk goods, the answer to that last question is either no or uncertain – and both answers represent unmanaged risk.
Working through those questions with a carrier who understands both the operational and coverage dimensions of freight is one of the most practical risk management steps a shipping operation can take. The goal is not the most comprehensive policy available – it is coverage that matches the actual risk profile of the goods being moved. Getting that calibration right is straightforward when the right conversations happen early.
Freight insurance is one of those topics that feels administrative until it becomes urgent. The shippers who handle it well tend to have done the thinking in advance – not because they expected a loss, but because they understood that coverage decisions made before a shipment moves are infinitely easier to get right than coverage disputes managed after something goes wrong. If your current freight operation has not recently reviewed what CMR liability actually means for the goods you ship, that conversation is worth having – and Road Freight Company is a good place to start it.

